I had some computer issues last night and despite my persistence, the computer simply refused to work long enough to post a photo. So, I'm going to catch up tonight.
While heading back from Bryce Canyon to Boulder for dinner on Friday evening, we came to a view stop on the road right as the sun set and saw this:
55mm, 3 seconds, f/16, ISO 200. I learned that a landscape shot like this does not work well with a wide angle because I wanted to use the foreground to create some interest and lead the eye to the sunlit mesa in the background. With a wide angle, the mesa becomes so small in the frame that it loses it's impact. I think the upshot is that camera position is probably more important at getting the right balance of foreground and background into a shot like this than using a wide-angle to "get more stuff" into the frame.
Here is the wide-angle version for comparison:
I like what wide-angle does for the foreground but you can see that the mesa sort of gets lost in the background. Which do you prefer, dear reader?